| |||||||
|
|
|
Full Day Kindergarten
Authored by: Steve Z on Wednesday, December 07 2005 @ 10:47 AM EST
The full day K (with 1/2 day option) is proposed to start during the 2006 - 2007 school year (not 2005-2006).
Full Day Kindergarten
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 07 2005 @ 12:51 PM EST
Steve; Thank you for providing all the good information about full-day K.
As you know, this has been proposed in past years and discussed and voted down during Town Meeting. As I recall, the main objections were: 1) questionable benefits / results of full-day K 2) added cost You have addressed these in your post to some degree and have invited people to search on the Web for studies showing the benefits. I understand that because of projected 1st grade enrollment next year, one 1st grade teacher won't be needed and that teacher could be used in the full-day K program. Based on this, full-day K should not increase costs next year. What about 1st grade enrollment projections in future years? Will we have to add the 1st grade teacher back? I recommend that you post the Web addresses of studies and articles on this Webpage as well as the RES Website. You mention that our current curriculum does not meet the Chittenden East Supervisory Union (CESU) model. Is this model a mandate or recommended. If it is a mandate, what are the implications of NOT having a full-day K? I ask these questions because I fully expect full-day K to be discussed and challenged at Town Meeting. In fact, I recommend you have a handout for people as they enter the meeting with a summary of the issues and facts. Full Day Kindergarten
Authored by: Steve Z on Wednesday, December 07 2005 @ 04:00 PM EST
Good questions/comments
Some answers: Although it can be difficult to project student population, the current 1st grade size will likely reduce the need to add a teacher in the near future. Some good places to start a research review: http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/9711.Elicker.kindergarten.html http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/62/42/6242.htm http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_6/1_2/3_2.asp The school web site is http://www.richmond.k12.vt.us/ Attending Kindergarten is not required (although offering K is required of the District) so, essentially the down-side of not offering the full District curriculum is potential lost learning opportunities and potential lost cost savings (at least one study has shown a cost benefit of full day K due to reduced special needs [such as special Ed costs] in subsequent grades). Also under No Child Left Behind (NCLB) our school are increasingly being measured by standardized tests (for better or worse), so I would argue we would see increased standardized scores (which may have positive financial implications as well). A reminder: A 1/2 day option (AM) is being proposed. Although I am a member of the Richmond Elementary School Board, my responses are my opinions. Richmond community member are always invited (and encouraged) to attend our meetings. Check the School web site for meeting dates and times (generally the third Wed. of each month). |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. |