Richmond Vermont's Citizen Journalist Website

MyRichmondVT.com
Home |  Submit Story |  Local Links |  Past Polls |  Calendar |  Advanced Search |  Site Statistics |   
Topics
Home
2007 Town Plan Update (7/29)
Kids (9/6)
Home & Garden (4/7)
Food (8/4)
Creative Writing (0/4)
Just for Fun (16/4)
Impact Fees (7/4)
MyRichmondVT (3/4)
Green Living (6/6)
Film & TV (15/3)
Books (3/7)
Art (3/7)
Music (10/6)
Outdoors (15/4)
Richmond News (36/15)
General News (16/6)
Planning & Zoning (0/5)
Schools & Education (7/4)
Volunteer Postings (8/58)
Politics (16/8)
Business (6/2)
Opinions (7/5)
Rumors (3/3)

User Functions
Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

Events
There are no upcoming events


Full Day Kindergarten

  
Tuesday, December 06 2005 @ 02:24 PM EST
Contributed by: Steve Z

Schools & EducationThe Richmond Elementary School (RES) Board has recently been exploring the possibility of expanding the current kindergarten offering.

Currently, the RES kindergarten consists of one full day (Six and ½ hours) three, four-hour days, and one day off. After two public hearings addressing the ”full-day K” issue in September and October, the Board unanimously voted to approve full day kindergarten, with a half-day option, for the 2005-2006 school year. In fact, the RES School Board has considered full day kindergarten for several years and the current schedule was implemented in the school year 2004 - 2005. The RES Board has found that although the current schedule has increased time for students in school, it has not significantly increased time spent with primary classroom teachers.

It would have been easy for the RES Board to just “jump on the bandwagon” and follow in the footsteps of the ever increasing number of schools nation wide ( including Chittenden East Supervisory Union schools Underhill ID and Jericho Elementary) in adopting full day kindergarten. As of 2001, 60 % of students nationwide spend between five and six hours everyday in the classroom (U.S. Census Bureau, 2001). But as dear old Dad used to say “If so and so were to jump off a bridge would you?”. Well, no I would not - at least not before I checked how deep the water was. The board has looked closely at the pros and cons of full day kindergarten. Perhaps the primary reason the Board has the responsibility to adopt full day K is that the current four day model does not and cannot support the Chittenden East Supervisory Union (CESU) model kindergarten curriculum (or, for that matter, the Vermont Department of Education’s Grade Level Expectations). Currently the RES kindergarten eliminates one unit from the CESU Social Studies curriculum, implements less than ½ of the Communications Curriculum (language arts, reading and writing),completes 1/3 of the Mathematics units, 2/3 of the Science units and has limited Guidance and Health Education units.

The vast majority of individuals who spoke at the recent public hearings expressed support for the full day schedule. In order to provide the best possible options for all parents, the ½ day (morning) option was maintained. The full day K option will increase the total hours per week from 18.5 hours to 32.5 hours. The weight of recent research evidence includes but is not limited to the following documented benefits: increased school readiness (students are better prepared for first grade learning), higher academic achievement (on standardized tests and classroom grades [for better or worse, increasingly schools are being judged by these standardized tests]), faster rate of literacy and language development, social and emotional benefits (positive classrooms behavior), and potential decreased costs (by reduced retention and remediation rates). Based on current RES projections for student population for the 2005 -2006 school year, no new teachers will be required to support the full day K program. By implementing the full day K program the RES Board has also proposed eliminating the mid-day bus run at a cost savings of approximately $8,000 to the supervisory union. Existing physical space will accommodate the expanding offering. If full day K is not implemented during the 2006-2007 year, the district will save approximately $41,000 in teacher salary and benefits (approximately $20 per $200,000 of assessed property value); however the district will not realize the $8,000 transportation savings.

The RES Board is keenly aware that simply offering more hours will not result in the aforementioned benefits. A full day kindergarten must include: quality teachers, developmentally appropriate curriculum that emphasizes language development and emergent
literacy experiences, and includes close ties and information sharing between parents and teachers. More time for informal play and time for exploration will be possible. By allowing for a less hectic schedule teachers can gear instruction to students needs and allow for appropriate student assessment. Most importantly, the CESU curriculum can be fully implemented.

Common concerns with full day Kindergarten include the following: worry about implementing an overly demanding curriculum, length of day, cost, local autonomy and competition for early childhood funding and quality staff. Time and time again parents have presented to the RES Board comments such as “my child learned more in a full day, (and) states he does not like half days” and “He would have liked to stay full days all week!” The RES Board has also heard from parents that their child will benefit most by remaining in a ½ day program, and as mentioned previously the RES Board is committed to allowing a ½ day morning option. Multiple up-to-date studies have been conducted on the full day K issue and are available on-line; the RES Board encourages Richmond residents to conduct a global search for “full day kindergarten” and review some of the available information, the RES Board also encourages Richmond residents to provide the support needed for the proposed kindergarten schedule.

Full day K has been the focal point of every board meeting for many months. The board feels that it is our responsibility to provide the best possible public school program for our Kindergarten through 4th grade school within reasonable financial costs. The board feels that all students will benefit from a well-balanced, complete Kindergarten curriculum.


Note: This piece has been submitted by RES School Board member Stephen Znamierowski on behalf of the RES School Board.







    
[This story has been viewed 1738 times]    


Full Day Kindergarten | 3 comments | Create New Account
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
Full Day Kindergarten
Authored by: Steve Z on Wednesday, December 07 2005 @ 10:47 AM EST
The full day K (with 1/2 day option) is proposed to start during the 2006 - 2007 school year (not 2005-2006).
Full Day Kindergarten
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 07 2005 @ 12:51 PM EST
Steve; Thank you for providing all the good information about full-day K.

As you know, this has been proposed in past years and discussed and voted down during Town Meeting. As I recall, the main objections were:
1) questionable benefits / results of full-day K
2) added cost

You have addressed these in your post to some degree and have invited people to search on the Web for studies showing the benefits.

I understand that because of projected 1st grade enrollment next year, one 1st grade teacher won't be needed and that teacher could be used in the full-day K program. Based on this, full-day K should not increase costs next year. What about 1st grade enrollment projections in future years? Will we have to add the 1st grade teacher back?

I recommend that you post the Web addresses of studies and articles on this Webpage as well as the RES Website.

You mention that our current curriculum does not meet the Chittenden East Supervisory Union (CESU) model. Is this model a mandate or recommended. If it is a mandate, what are the implications of NOT having a full-day K?

I ask these questions because I fully expect full-day K to be discussed and challenged at Town Meeting. In fact, I recommend you have a handout for people as they enter the meeting with a summary of the issues and facts.
Full Day Kindergarten
Authored by: Steve Z on Wednesday, December 07 2005 @ 04:00 PM EST
Good questions/comments

Some answers:

Although it can be difficult to project student population, the current 1st grade size will likely reduce the need to add a teacher in the near future.

Some good places to start a research review:

http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/9711.Elicker.kindergarten.html

http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/62/42/6242.htm

http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_6/1_2/3_2.asp

The school web site is

http://www.richmond.k12.vt.us/

Attending Kindergarten is not required (although offering K is required of the District) so, essentially the down-side of not offering the full District curriculum is potential lost learning opportunities and potential lost cost savings (at least one study has shown a cost benefit of full day K due to reduced special needs [such as special Ed costs] in subsequent grades). Also under No Child Left Behind (NCLB) our school are increasingly being measured by standardized tests (for better or worse), so I would argue we would see increased standardized scores (which may have positive financial implications as well).

A reminder: A 1/2 day option (AM) is being proposed.

Although I am a member of the Richmond Elementary School Board, my responses are my opinions. Richmond community member are always invited (and encouraged) to attend our meetings. Check the School web site for meeting dates and times (generally the third Wed. of each month).
What's Related

Story Options
  • Mail Story to a Friend
  • Printable Story Format


  • Created this page in 0.16 seconds


     Copyright © 2008 My Richmond VT
     All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.